Upgrade.Vet

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01977

Original file (PD2012 01977.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

N A M E: C ASE: P D1 2 01 9 77
^BR ^A ^N ^C ^H ^O ^F ^SE ^R ^V ^I ^C ^E: ^A ^R ^M ^Y ^BO ^A ^R ^D ^D ^A ^T ^E: ² ⁰¹ ³ ⁰⁷ ¹ ⁷
^SE ^P ^A ^R ^A ^T ^IO ^N ^D ^A ^T ^E: ²⁰ ⁰ ⁶⁰⁴ ⁰ ⁴

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (11C20/Indirect Fire Infantry) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The CI’s back pain began after a motor vehicle accident (MVA) in Iraq in 2003. Initially treated conservatively, he was later hospitalized for a month due to persistent pain. X-rays were negative for additional lumbar injuries following a second MVA in 2004. Physical therapy (PT) was continued along with various medications, but these yielded limited relief. He re-deployed in early 2005 and upon return he was diagnosed with disc bulges and degenerative disc disease (DDD). Medication and PT continuedand surgical intervention was ruled out. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U2, L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The LBP condition, characterized as lumbago, spondylosis with L4-5, L5-S1 disc bulge and facet arthropathy was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-

501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated chronic LBP as unfitting, rated 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.

C I C O NT E NT IO N : T h e C I e la bo r a t e d n o s p e c i f ic c o nt e nt i o n i n h is a pp li c a t io n .

SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting “chronic low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease with L4-5, L5-S1 disc bulge and facet arthropathy, without neurologic deficit, range of motion limited by pain, positive tenderness” condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

R A T I N G C O MP A R ISO N :

S er vic e IP E B – D at e d 20060123 V A - ( 3 M o s. P re - S e p a r at io n )
^C ^ondi ^t ⁱ ^o ⁿ ^C ^od ^e ^R ^at ⁱⁿ ^g ^C ^ondi ^t ⁱ ^o ⁿ ^C ^od ^e ^R ^at ⁱⁿ ^g ^E ^x ^am

^C^h^r^oⁿⁱ^c^LB^P^Se^co^nd^ary^to
^DDD^w^/^L^4-5,^L^5-^S¹^Di^s^c^B^u^l^ge
^&^F^a^c^e^t^A^rt^h^r^o^p^at^h^y,^w^/o
^Neu^r^o^l^o^g^{ic
D}^e^fi^c^it,^RO^M
_L_imit_e_d_b_y_P_ai_n_,_Po_s_iti_v_e

5299-5242 10%

Lumbago Secondary to Spondylosis & DDD w/L4-5, L5-S1 Disc Bulge & Facet Arthropathy

_I_n_t_e_rmit_t_en_t_Lo_s_s_o_f_Uri_n_ary

5242-5243 10 % * 20060131

Tenderness
_C_o_n_tr_o_l_a/w_B_a_c_k_C_o_ndi_ti_o_n^{7599-7542
10}^%^{*
20060131}

^N^o^Addi^tⁱ^oⁿ^al^M^EB^/^PE^B^Eⁿ^tri^e^s^O^t^he^r^x^{6
20060131}
^C^o^m^bin^e^d^:^10%^C^o^m^bin^e^d^:³⁰^%^*
^D^er^iv^e^d^f^ro^m^VA^R^atⁱⁿ^g^D^ecⁱ^sⁱ^oⁿ^(VA^R^D⁾^d^at^e^d²⁰⁰⁶⁰⁶²⁹⁽^mo^st^pro^xⁱ^m^ate^to^d^ate^o^f^s^e^p^a^r^atⁱ^oⁿ^[^D^OS]).
* VARD dated 20070810 increased the back condition rating to 20% effective 20070313 and the urinary control condition to 40% also effective 20070313 (combined 70% with addition of PTSD).

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Low Back Pain. The narrative summary notes that the CI had been referred to the MEB because of chronic, ongoing lower back pain with right inner thigh numbness, intermittent giving way of his right leg and loss of urinary control, following his injury in Iraq in March 2003. He was hospitalized in Iraq for about a month in May-June 2003 for evaluation, rest and treatment with PT. Pain in the lower back and numbness and pain in the right inner thigh continued after his return to CONUS. He also noted problems with urinary control, with loss of control occurring about once every 3 weeks on average. He was involved in another MVA in October 2004, and X-rays and CT scans of the head and spine were negative following that accident. The CI deployed again in January 2005 but was medevac’d to CONUS in June 2005 after sustaining injuries to his arm in an improvised explosive device (IED) blast. At the MEB exam, the CI reported that he continued to experience LBP in spite of attempts at treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, opioids and muscle relaxers. Discomfort radiated to the right hip and inner thigh and urinary difficulties persisted. The MEB physical exam noted tenderness to palpation over the L3-S1 areas and mild spasm in the lower lumbar area. Straight leg raising (SLR) was negative to 80 degrees. Range-of-motion (ROM) is as recorded in the table below. Lumbar spine X-ray series performed in August 2005 and repeated in October 2005 showed spina bifida occulta at the S1 level with normal vertebral alignment. Vertebral bodies and disk spaces were intact. No fracture, spondylolysis or spondylolistheses was seen. Magnetic resonance imaging performed in November 2005 showed an L4-5 posterior disk bulge with facet arthropathy, and an L5-S1 disk bulge with facet arthropathy, causing foraminal stenosis at both levels. Electromyogram (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) performed in November 2005 were normal bilaterally. Neurosurgery consult on 28 November 2005 stated that there were no indications for surgical intervention regarding the CI’s DDD and bulging disks. Urology consult on 19 December 2005 recommended only a trial of Detrol for bladder control. The commander’s statement indicates that the CI’s back condition rendered him incapable of performing his duties as a Mortarman.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported back stiffness, occasional weakness and inability to lift much without pain due to the spine condition. He reported that he had suffered from pain located in his lower back for 3 years. He denied having radiating pain on movement. Examination of the thoracolumbar spine revealed tenderness with no muscle spasm. SLR was normal bilaterally. ROM measurements were as documented in the table below. There were no signs of intervertebral disc syndrome with chronic and permanent nerve root involvement, and neurological exam of the lower extremities was within normal limits. A C&P exam 13 months post-separation documented greater limited forward flexion (60 degrees; normal 90 degrees) as charted below, with subsequent exam in 2009 indicating improved forward flexion to 80 degrees.

The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees)	PT ~6 Mo. Pre-Sep ⁽^20051026)	MEB ~4 Mo. Pre-Sep ⁽^20051220)	VA C&P ~3 Mo. Pre- Sep (20060131)	VA C&P ~13 Mo. Post-Sep ⁽^20070511)
Flexion (90 Normal)	60	75	80	60
Extension (30)	20	25	20	20
R Lat Flexion (30)	20	25	30	25
L Lat Flexion (30)	25	25	30	30
^R^Ro^tati^oⁿ⁽³⁰⁾	^N^o^t^m^e^a^su^r^e^d	⁽²⁰⁾²²	³⁰	³⁰
^L^Ro^tati^oⁿ⁽³⁰⁾	^N^o^t^m^e^a^su^r^e^d	⁽³⁰⁾²⁸	³⁰	³⁰
^C^o^m^bⁱ^ne^d⁽²⁴⁰⁾	^U^N^D	²⁰⁰	²²⁰	¹⁹⁵
Comment	Tenderness to palpation of paraspinals; mild spasm L1-L3 region	Discomfort limiting his movement & ROM. Mild spasm in lower lumbar area. Heel & toe walk normal.	Painful motion. Posture and gait within normal limits.	Painful motion. No spasm or guarding. Motor and neurologic exams normal.
§4.71a Rating	20%	10%	10%	20%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB characterized the back condition as “chronic low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease with L4-L5, L5-S1 disc bulge and facet arthropathy, without neurologic deficit, range of motion limited by pain, positive tenderness.” It coded it as analogous to 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine) and assigned a disability rating of 10%. The VA characterized the condition as “Lumbago secondary to spondylosis and degenerative disc disease with L4-L5, L5- S1 disc bulge and facet arthropathy” and coded it 5242-5243 (intervertebral disk syndrome). Noting limitation of motion, it also rated the condition at 10%. Subsequent VA exams over a year after separation were not considered indicative of the CI’s condition at the time of separation. The Board considered that the MEB and C&P exams were both proximal to each other and relatively proximal to the date of separation. Although there had been mention of right anterior leg numbness by the CI elsewhere in the record, sensory findings were not mentioned in the MEB exam and were said to be absent on the VA exam. Neurosurgical consult performed on 28 November 2005, also describes normal sensation bilaterally and the examiner stated while there was “incontinence without urgency, there were no sphincter control problems.” Furthermore, EMG and NCS were within normal limits. The Board also considered coding under 5243 (intervertebral disk syndrome). However, without evidence of incapacitating episodes during the 12 months prior to separation, members agreed that that coding option would not have led to a more favorable disability rating for the CI. The Board concluded that given the degree of limitation of motion due to pain present in the examinations in evidence as well as the normal spinal contour and gait documented in the neurosurgery and C&P exams, the disability at the time of separation could not be rated higher than the 10% rating assigned by the PEB. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the LBP condition.

The Board considered whether an additional rating could be recommended under a peripheral nerve or genitourinary system dysfunction code (neuropathy), as conferred by the VA, for the associated intermittent loss of urinary control associated with the back condition at separation. Firm Board precedence requires a functional impairment linked to fitness to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating or other residuals to disability in spine cases. The sensory component in this case has no functional implications, no motor weakness was in evidence, and neurologic testing was normal. The urinary control symptoms had been noted since March 2003 and did not interfere with deployment. The increased

symptoms described in the VA records in March 2007 and thereafter were considered post- separation worsening and were not indicative of the condition at the time of separation. There is thus no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with fitness implications) from residual radiculopathy or urinary symptoms; and, the Board cannot support a recommendation for an additional disability rating on this basis.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of any residual condition secondary to the back condition (peripheral nerve or urinary loss of control), the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB’s implied not unfitting adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

R E C O MM E N D A T IO N : T h e B o ar d , t h e r e f o r e , r e c o mm end s t h a t th e re b e n o r e c h ara c te r i z a t i o n o f th e C I’s d isa b il i t y a n d s e p ara t i o n d e te rm i n a t i on , as fo llo w s:

UNFITTING CONDITION	VASRD CODE	RATING
Low Back Pain	5299-5242	10%

COMBINED	10%

Th e fo llo w i n g d o c u m e nt ary e vi d e n c e w as c on s i d e r ed :

E x h i b it A. D D F o rm 2 9 4 , d a t e d 2 01 2 12 1 2 , w / a t chs
^E ^x ^h ⁱ ^b ^it ^B ^. ^Servi ^c ^e ^T ^r ^e ^a ^t ^m ^en ^t ^R ^e ^c ^o ^rd
^E ^x ^h ⁱ ^b ^it ^C ^. ^D ^ep ^a ^r ^t ^m ^e ⁿ ^t ^o ^f ^V ^e ^te ^r ^a ⁿ ^s’ ^A ^ff ^airs ^T ^r ^e ^a ^t ^m ^en ^t ^R ^e ^c ^o ^rd

SFMR-RB

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB)

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130019923 (PD201201977)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00591

Original file (PD2011-00591.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The CI was medically separated with a 20% disability rating. On examination, the surgeon documented normal gait, strength, reflexes and sensation and concluded the back pain was “mechanical pain to testing.” He noted the MRI findings with multilevel spondylitic disease (degenerative disc and joint) and thought that some of the pain was discogenic in nature, and possibly an annular tear at L5-S1.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00046

Original file (PD2013 00046.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Despitenon-operativetreatmentwith non-steroidalanti-inflammatorydrugs,periods oflimited duty(LIMDU) andlightduty, physicaltherapy(PT),andepiduralsteroidinjections (ESI),theCI’s conditioncouldnotbeadequatelyrehabilitated tocontinuetomeet thephysicalrequirements ofhisMilitary OccupationalSpecialty(MOS)orsatisfy physicalfitnessstandards. SignificantBack Pain/LumbagoandDiskDegeneration Condition . ROM limited by pain; Gait-normal; Pos.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01840

Original file (PD-2013-01840.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the low back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01790

Original file (PD2012 01790.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

[The CI] suffers from back pain. Additionally, under the current general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine, which uses ROM measurements for rating, the CI’s back pain would also be rated at 10% based on the ROM measurements documented in the NARSUM. Since no evidence of functional impairment exists in this case, the Board would not have supported a recommendation for additional rating based on peripheral nerve impairment (as opposed to the PEB’s adjudication).
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00814

Original file (PD 2014 00814.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Anterior Lumbar Fusion524120%Low Back Strain with Sciatica5243-523720%20100128Left Leg Numbness Associated with Low Back Strain with Sciatica852010%20100128L5-S1 Herniated DiskCategory IISee Above20100128MicrodiskectomyCategory IISee Above20100128Other x1 (Not in Scope)Other x520100111 Combined: 20%Combined: 70%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20100420 (most proximate to date of separation) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00062

Original file (PD-2012-00062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

Treatment records document relief of headaches with medication. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CIs disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Intervertebral Disc Syndrome 5243 10% COMBINED 10% The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120118, w/atchs Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010 00479

Original file (PD2010 00479.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

A lot of evidence showed a problem at L4-L5 level, that was included in the MEB findings report and later in VAMC reports, yet that was not considered in the decision of the MEB board. Therefore, the Board determined that a disability rating of 10% for the CI’s LBP condition was reasonably justified. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130016402 (PD201000479)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00299

Original file (PD2012-00299.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

The MEB physical exam was normal. The PEB rated the back condition at 10%; the VA, however, awarded 20% based on the hypothetical reduction with repetitive motion posited by the VA examiner. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02636

Original file (PD-2013-02636.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain5299-523710%Degenerative Disc Disease, Moderate in Nature, L5-S-1 and Mild at L4-5 with Facet Spondylosis Lumbar Spine5242-501010%20080502Obstructive Sleep ApneaNot UnfittingSleep Apnea6847NSCSTRTinnitusNot UnfittingTinnitus Right Ear626010%STROther x 3 (Not In Scope)Other x 5 RATING: 10%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20080613(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). An MRI of the...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00364

Original file (PD2010-00364.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. Service Treatment Record I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01977

Similar Decisions